molded, wrapped in cardboard, and fitted with a fuse.
Ubiquitous, it blasted hard rock mines and mountains,
quarries, railroad cuttings, tunnels,
helped extinguish the great San Francisco fire of 1906,
and made Alfred B. Nobel rich, but failed to serve
in the many cartoon schemes of Wile E. Coyote
to capture the quick but inarticulate Roadrunner.
A stick of dynamite was useful
in many comic and dramatic scenes
as its fuse burned shorter and shorter
(our hero having lighted it instead of a candle).
Go ahead and make fun of it;
it was popular because it was powerful
but it didn’t explode unless you wanted it to,
which probably has little bearing
on our use of the word as a form of praise
blurted out like a little explosion,
and printed with an exclamation point
at the end like a fuse.
Engines of invention
Alfred’s father worked for the Russians
manufacturing submarine mines and torpedoes
until the end of the Crimean War
when the family returned to Sweden.
There they set up a laboratory
to experiment with nitroglycerin,
which was no doubt Alfred’s idea.
Alfred worked even harder
to invent a safe way to handle
the powerful but volitile explosive,
even more insanely devoted to the problem,
after this laboratory exploded
killing his younger brother Emil Adolfe.
Engines of war
Alfred was accused of improving the engines of war,
but he thought that his explosives would lead to peace
because they made war more horrible.
Obviously he underestimated the human capacity
to suffer and to inflict suffering, and it’s ironic
that many later repeated the same argument
to support the deployment of nuclear bombs.
Alfred Nobel’s motivations are more admirable than his
legacy, not counting his money for funding annual prizes. His
explosives did not lead to peace. I am not sympathetic to the
assertion that availabilty of the weapon is not to blame. You give
an angry man a gun and he can hurt someone; give him a wet noodle
and he can hurt fewer people. With or without Nobel’s
inventions, we would continue to fight wars, but they helped
killed more people sooner.
Alfred Nobel’s motivations are more admirable than his legacy, not counting his money for funding annual prizes. His explosives did not lead to peace. I am not sympathetic to the assertion that availabilty of the weapon is not to blame. You give an angry man a gun and he can hurt someone; give him a wet noodle and he can hurt fewer people. With or without Nobel’s inventions, we would continue to fight wars, but they helped killed more people sooner.
See also in The book of science:
Readings on wikipedia: